SGI QUARTERLY 
 
 
 

 




Feature

 

Revealing Our Interconnectedness

By Judith Large

[Photo: Simon Pizzey]

Amid the confusion, fear, media coverage and massive military response following the tragedy of September 11, we must not lose sight of the need for genuine justice, both in terms of due process and, more broadly, in terms of social justice in our world.

In two other recent cases of mass murder and crimes against humanity, Bosnia and Rwanda, the international community has established criminal courts at The Hague and Arusha. Slow, painstaking, they nevertheless function, and the public can see justice done in an accountable way. Surely fighting terror with terror is revenge, not justice.

I have been very surprised how the violent response to the September 11 attacks has mobilized action in the small English rural town where I live. People have been sickened at the thought of more killing. It is so obvious to them that if you respond by dealing death and violence, many more extremists will arise to take the place of those who die. They have protested against the war but have also linked this to broader issues. There is growing recognition that the prevailing ideology of globalization, which claims that everyone is now entitled to drink Coca-Cola, wear brand-name jeans and use computers, obscures a reality in which, from Jakarta to Cairo, the poor increasingly feel the impact of the debt crisis, economic restructuring and collusion among global elites. 

For me, the world may increasingly be seen not as a chessboard of state powers but as a series of layers. There is the first world, the second and the third, but now I see the existence of the fourth--the network of little black holes, of people who feel dispossessed and excluded, pockets amid the mainstream which exist in every country. Of course terrorist networks can organize in that way, but there are also positive potentialities in such networks of globally-minded citizens. Around the world, women are becoming particularly active and outspoken and feel acutely their need for a stronger voice.

The current groundswell of protest will probably slow down, but ordinary people are continuing to recognize that changes in lifestyle can make a difference, that their consumption decisions are directly related to the lives of people in other countries. They are aware of exploitative labor conditions, the need for fair trade and direct trade, and they see that the world is one interconnected, living system. We must avoid falling into the trap of thinking in terms of "camps," of "two cultures" or the "with us or against us" dichotomy. 


Key Challenges Now
I believe we must now take up the following challenges:

  • Seek to be true global citizens, thinking across borders and questioning potential hypocrisy. The Taliban was condemned for a justice system based on "an eye for an eye"--but this is precisely what was undertaken in response. 

  • Advocate and reclaim due process. We must promote the United Nations and reexamine what it is for--is it allowed any independence of thought and action, any support, respect?

  • Support legitimate criminal investigation within the framework of law and justice including the formation of an International Criminal Court with agreed jurisdiction for such cases.

  • Disassociate criminal acts from the host population of the group we think carried them out.

  • Examine double standards in international relations. The Taliban was not the only regime discriminating against women or having laws we do not agree with. Yet we have no problems conducting business with similar regimes when it suits us.

  • Address the root causes--global inequality, offensive national behaviors, greed for oil and natural resources, the legacy of great power experiments with nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.

  • Question censorship and threats to civil liberties. Is dissent allowed or stifled? How well does democracy function in crisis?

Perhaps in future we will look back and say not that the world changed on September 11, 2001, but that we saw it clearly for the first time--as though a curtain was pulled away. We must turn this crisis into an opportunity to reach out and understand other viewpoints, to learn about other cultures, to take a stand on injustice. By fighting terror with terror, we risk becoming exactly what we oppose.

Judith Large is an independent consultant on conflict resolution and international development. She is also involved in conflict prevention and resolution teaching and training.



<<Previous Page<<

>>Next Page>>

January, 2002

Index
Dialogue Holds the Key
Searching for Appropriate Responses
Revealing Our Interconnectedness
A Systemic Analysis of Security
Dialogue of Civilizations
The Necessary Action
Patricia Lomden Essay
Managing the World's Oceans
Water Blindness 
Father of Peace Studies -- Johan Galtung
Marco Della Fonte - Florence, Italy
Richard Perez - New Jersey, U.S.A. 
Engaged in Society
Interfaith Symposiums
From the Ashes
Fund-Raising for Afghan Refugees
Victory Over Violence
"Embattled Buddhists"
  Women Speak Out for Peace
Soka Gakkai Founding Day
World Picture Books
Simon Wiesenthal Exhibit
Boys and Girls Art Exhibition
Victor Hugo House of Literature 
Changing Poison into Medicine 
From the Collection of the Victor Hugo House of Literature
SGI Members - Latin America 


© Soka Gakkai International. All rights reserved.